Why cheap car checks often miss important information
Cheap car checks may use limited data sources or cover only some risk categories to reduce costs. While they may seem like a good deal, they can leave critical risks undiscovered, which can be costly in the long run.
Limited data sources
Comprehensive car history checks query multiple official UK databases, including the Police National Computer, DVLA records, finance company databases, insurance industry databases, and MOT test records. Each database query has associated costs, which providers must cover.
To reduce costs, cheap checks may query only one or two databases rather than the full range. For example, a cheap check might query only MOT records, missing financial, legal, and damage history information. This creates blind spots that can leave critical risks undiscovered.
A check that queries only MOT records cannot identify outstanding finance, stolen status, or write-off history. While MOT information is useful, it is only one piece of the puzzle. Missing other categories can lead to costly mistakes.
Partial coverage
Comprehensive checks cover all major risk categories: financial, legal, damage, usage, and identity. Cheap checks may cover only some categories to reduce costs, leaving others unchecked.
For example, a cheap check might cover finance and MOT but miss damage history or identity verification. This creates blind spots where critical risks may be present but undiscovered. A vehicle with clean finance and MOT records may still have a write-off history or identity mismatches.
Partial coverage can give false confidence. If a cheap check shows no issues in the categories it covers, buyers may assume the vehicle is safe to purchase without realising other categories were not checked. This can lead to overlooking critical risks.
Limited detail
Comprehensive checks provide detailed information about each category, including dates, amounts, categories, and explanations. Cheap checks may provide only basic information, such as "finance present" without details about the provider, amount, or agreement type.
Limited detail makes it harder to assess risks accurately. For example, knowing that finance is present is useful, but knowing the provider, amount, and whether it has been settled is more useful for making an informed decision. Basic information may not be enough to assess the situation properly.
Detailed information helps buyers understand what they are seeing and make informed decisions. Cheap checks that provide only basic information may leave buyers uncertain about how to proceed.
Poor presentation
Comprehensive checks invest in clear presentation, plain language explanations, and helpful organisation to make information easy to understand. Cheap checks may present information in a raw, unorganised format that is difficult to navigate.
Poor presentation can make it harder to identify important information or understand what the data means. If information is buried in long lists or presented without context, buyers may miss critical risks or misinterpret what they are seeing.
Clear presentation is essential for making informed decisions. If a check is difficult to understand, it may be less useful even if it contains comprehensive data. Investment in presentation helps buyers navigate and interpret results effectively.
The real cost of cheap checks
While cheap checks may seem like a good deal upfront, the real cost can be much higher if they miss critical risks. Discovering outstanding finance, stolen status, or write-off history after purchase can result in losing the vehicle, losing your money, or facing legal consequences.
The cost of discovering a major issue after purchase far exceeds the cost difference between a cheap check and a comprehensive check. A comprehensive check is a small investment compared to the financial and legal risks of purchasing a problematic vehicle.
When choosing a car history check, consider what is included, not just the price. A check that covers all major risk categories with current, detailed information from multiple sources provides better value than a cheap check that misses critical risks.
How to identify a comprehensive check
A comprehensive check should clearly state what categories it covers and which databases are queried. Look for coverage of financial, legal, damage, usage, and identity categories, with queries to multiple official UK databases.
Clear presentation with plain language explanations also indicates investment in quality. When comparing checks, look beyond price to what is included. A check that covers all major risk categories with detailed information from multiple sources provides better value than a cheap check that misses critical risks. Carpeep's report covers all major risk categories in one clear format, using data from multiple official sources.
Related information
For detailed information about specific checks, see the vehicle check guides.
Frequently asked questions
Are free checks ever comprehensive?
Free checks are typically very limited, covering only basic information such as MOT history or basic vehicle details. They rarely provide comprehensive coverage of all major risk categories or query multiple data sources.
How do I know if a check is comprehensive or cheap?
Check what categories are covered and which databases are queried. A comprehensive check should cover financial, legal, damage, usage, and identity categories, using data from multiple official UK databases. The provider should clearly state what is included.
Is it worth paying more for a comprehensive check?
Yes. The cost difference is typically small compared to the financial and legal risks of purchasing a problematic vehicle. A comprehensive check that identifies all major risks provides better value than a cheap check that misses critical information.
Can I combine multiple cheap checks to get comprehensive coverage?
In theory, yes, but this is inefficient and may cost more than a single comprehensive check. Different providers may also present information differently, making it harder to get a clear picture. A single comprehensive check is more efficient.