Used comparison · 2025 DVSA data
Hyundai I20 vs Kia RIO
Two sister-company superminis bought for the long warranty. That warranty says nothing about the car's history.
Across 230,949 initial MOT tests in 2025, the Hyundai I20 passed 79.17% against 75.84% for the Kia RIO. A real gap, but not a decisive one on its own.
Already found one of them?
Enter its registration to see finance, write-off, stolen, mileage and keeper history before you decide.
Head to head on the MOT record
| Measure | Hyundai I20 | Kia RIO |
|---|---|---|
| First-time MOT pass rate | 79.17% | 75.84% |
| Tests in 2025 | 132,547 | 98,402 |
| Average mileage at test | 60,100 | 65,787 |
| Average age at test | 10 years | 10.4 years |
| Most common fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Diesel share of tests | 4.04% | 18.46% |
The UK average across all cars in this data is 77.3%. The Hyundai I20 sits above it by 1.9 points, and the Kia RIO sits below it by 1.5 points. The Kia RIO also arrives at test with roughly 5,687 more miles on average, which usually says more about who buys it and what they use it for than about how long it lasts.
Which one holds up better as it ages
This is the part that matters when you are buying used. A headline pass rate mixes three-year-old cars in with fifteen-year-old ones. Split by age, you can see what each model actually does over time.
| Age at test | Hyundai I20 | Kia RIO |
|---|---|---|
| 3 to 5 years | 90.71% | 91.21% |
| 6 to 10 years | 85.31% | 83.5% |
| 11 years and over | 70.29% | 66.36% |
The Hyundai I20 gives up less as it gets older. Between the youngest and oldest brackets it loses 20.4 percentage points against 24.9 for the Kia RIO, a difference of 4.5 points. On a ten-year-old example that is the figure to weigh, not the headline number.
What each one fails on
These are the areas testers recorded most often across every failed 2025 test for each model. Read them as a viewing checklist for that model, not as a fault list for any particular car.
Hyundai I20
- Brakes 25.56%
- Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 20.07%
- Suspension 17.58%
- Tyres 12.44%
- Visibility 10.14%
Share of all recorded failure items.
Full Hyundai I20 failure detailKia RIO
- Brakes 21.44%
- Suspension 18.84%
- Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 18.17%
- Tyres 14.05%
- Visibility 8.73%
Share of all recorded failure items.
Full Kia RIO failure detailBoth models fail most often on brakes, which is normal for cars of this age and tells you what to look at on either. The difference between them is in what comes next on each list.
The specific items testers wrote down
One level deeper than the category. These are the individual defects recorded most often on each model.
Hyundai I20
- Ball joint dust cover ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt
- Position lamp not working
- Wipers does not clear the windscreen effectively
Kia RIO
- Tread depth tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm
- Track rod end ball joint has excessive play
- Position lamp not working
What this comparison cannot tell you
Everything above describes two models across the whole UK fleet. It says nothing about the one car in the advert you are looking at. Two I20s of the same year and mileage can be worth thousands apart because of things that never appear in MOT data:
- Outstanding finance. If a lender still has an agreement recorded against the car, that claim does not disappear because you paid the seller.
- Insurance write-off history. A Cat S or Cat N marker is permanent, changes what the car is worth, and does not appear on the V5C.
- Stolen markers. A car recorded as stolen can be seized even from a buyer who bought it honestly.
- Mileage history. The readings taken at every MOT are the clearest way to spot a clocked odometer.
- Previous keepers. An unusual number of keepers for the age of the car is worth asking about.
A Carpeep car history check reports all of those against the registration, plus tax status, import and export markers, scrapped status and the recorded vehicle identity, in one £15 report.
Check the car you are about to buy
One registration, one report. Finance, write-off, stolen, mileage, keepers, MOT and tax.
Read more on each car
- Buying a used Hyundai I20 Buying guide, MOT record and what to check
- Buying a used Kia RIO Buying guide, MOT record and what to check
Hyundai I20 vs Kia RIO FAQs
Is the Hyundai I20 or the Kia RIO more likely to pass its MOT?
The Hyundai I20 passed 79.17% of its initial MOT tests in the DVSA 2025 data against 75.84% for the Kia RIO, a gap of 3.3 percentage points. That is a fleet-wide average, not a prediction about the specific car you are looking at.
Does a higher MOT pass rate mean a more reliable car?
No. An MOT records whether a vehicle met the roadworthiness standard on the day it was tested. It does not test the engine, clutch or gearbox, and it does not measure how often a car breaks down. Pass rates are useful for comparing how two models are holding up across the whole UK fleet, and nothing more than that.
Which is cheaper to keep on the road, the Hyundai I20 or the Kia RIO?
This data does not price servicing or repairs, so it cannot answer that directly. What it does show is what each model most often fails on, which is a fair guide to where the money goes. The Hyundai I20 fails most often on brakes. The Kia RIO fails most often on brakes.
How do I check the actual Hyundai I20 I have found?
Enter its registration. A Carpeep car history check reports outstanding finance, insurance write-off markers, stolen markers, the mileage recorded at every MOT, previous keepers, tax and MOT status, import and export markers and scrapped status in one £15 report. None of that appears in model-level MOT statistics.
Which one has covered more miles by MOT time?
The average Kia RIO arrived at its 2025 MOT on 65,787 miles, against 60,100 for the Hyundai I20. That usually reflects who buys each car and what they use it for rather than how long it will last.
MOT figures aggregated from the DVSA MOT Anonymised data set for 2025 (class 4 initial tests, retests excluded), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. MOT results describe roadworthiness at test, not mechanical reliability.