Used comparison · 2025 DVSA data

Volvo XC40 vs BMW X1

Safety-led Swedish design against the class default, at similar used prices.

Across 195,203 initial MOT tests in 2025, the Volvo XC40 passed 91.46% against 85.23% for the BMW X1. That is a wide gap by the standards of this data, and worth weighing.

Already found one of them?

Enter its registration to see finance, write-off, stolen, mileage and keeper history before you decide.

One full report is £15. Instant results, no account needed.

Head to head on the MOT record

Measure Volvo XC40 BMW X1
First-time MOT pass rate 91.46% 85.23%
Tests in 2025 84,677 110,526
Average mileage at test 39,597 66,185
Average age at test 4.7 years 8.4 years
Most common fuel Petrol Diesel
Diesel share of tests 13.38% 64.08%

The UK average across all cars in this data is 77.3%. The Volvo XC40 sits above it by 14.2 points, and the BMW X1 sits above it by 7.9 points. The BMW X1 also arrives at test with roughly 26,588 more miles on average, which usually says more about who buys it and what they use it for than about how long it lasts.

Which one holds up better as it ages

This is the part that matters when you are buying used. A headline pass rate mixes three-year-old cars in with fifteen-year-old ones. Split by age, you can see what each model actually does over time.

Age at test Volvo XC40 BMW X1
3 to 5 years 92.35% 92.21%
6 to 10 years 88.75% 87.88%
11 years and over 100% 75.19%

The Volvo XC40 gives up less as it gets older. Between the youngest and oldest brackets it loses -7.7 percentage points against 17 for the BMW X1, a difference of 24.7 points. On a ten-year-old example that is the figure to weigh, not the headline number.

What each one fails on

These are the areas testers recorded most often across every failed 2025 test for each model. Read them as a viewing checklist for that model, not as a fault list for any particular car.

Volvo XC40

  • Tyres 44.38%
  • Brakes 31.87%
  • Visibility 5.64%
  • Suspension 5.19%
  • Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 4.13%

Share of all recorded failure items.

Full Volvo XC40 failure detail

BMW X1

  • Tyres 27.66%
  • Suspension 24%
  • Brakes 14.73%
  • Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 13.09%
  • Visibility 8.94%

Share of all recorded failure items.

Full BMW X1 failure detail

Both models fail most often on tyres, which is normal for cars of this age and tells you what to look at on either. The difference between them is in what comes next on each list.

The specific items testers wrote down

One level deeper than the category. These are the individual defects recorded most often on each model.

Volvo XC40

  • Brake pads less than 1.5 mm thick
  • Condition has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords
  • Tread depth tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm

BMW X1

  • Pins and bushes pin or bush excessively worn
  • Condition has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords
  • Tread depth tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm

What this comparison cannot tell you

Everything above describes two models across the whole UK fleet. It says nothing about the one car in the advert you are looking at. Two XC40s of the same year and mileage can be worth thousands apart because of things that never appear in MOT data:

  • Outstanding finance. If a lender still has an agreement recorded against the car, that claim does not disappear because you paid the seller.
  • Insurance write-off history. A Cat S or Cat N marker is permanent, changes what the car is worth, and does not appear on the V5C.
  • Stolen markers. A car recorded as stolen can be seized even from a buyer who bought it honestly.
  • Mileage history. The readings taken at every MOT are the clearest way to spot a clocked odometer.
  • Previous keepers. An unusual number of keepers for the age of the car is worth asking about.

A Carpeep car history check reports all of those against the registration, plus tax status, import and export markers, scrapped status and the recorded vehicle identity, in one £15 report.

Check the car you are about to buy

One registration, one report. Finance, write-off, stolen, mileage, keepers, MOT and tax.

£15 for a full report, backed by a £30,000 data guarantee.

Read more on each car

Other comparisons with these cars

Volvo XC40 vs BMW X1 FAQs

Is the Volvo XC40 or the BMW X1 more likely to pass its MOT?

The Volvo XC40 passed 91.46% of its initial MOT tests in the DVSA 2025 data against 85.23% for the BMW X1, a gap of 6.2 percentage points. That is a fleet-wide average, not a prediction about the specific car you are looking at.

Does a higher MOT pass rate mean a more reliable car?

No. An MOT records whether a vehicle met the roadworthiness standard on the day it was tested. It does not test the engine, clutch or gearbox, and it does not measure how often a car breaks down. Pass rates are useful for comparing how two models are holding up across the whole UK fleet, and nothing more than that.

Which is cheaper to keep on the road, the Volvo XC40 or the BMW X1?

This data does not price servicing or repairs, so it cannot answer that directly. What it does show is what each model most often fails on, which is a fair guide to where the money goes. The Volvo XC40 fails most often on tyres. The BMW X1 fails most often on tyres.

How do I check the actual Volvo XC40 I have found?

Enter its registration. A Carpeep car history check reports outstanding finance, insurance write-off markers, stolen markers, the mileage recorded at every MOT, previous keepers, tax and MOT status, import and export markers and scrapped status in one £15 report. None of that appears in model-level MOT statistics.

Which one has covered more miles by MOT time?

The average BMW X1 arrived at its 2025 MOT on 66,185 miles, against 39,597 for the Volvo XC40. That usually reflects who buys each car and what they use it for rather than how long it will last.

MOT figures aggregated from the DVSA MOT Anonymised data set for 2025 (class 4 initial tests, retests excluded), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. MOT results describe roadworthiness at test, not mechanical reliability.